
Building Equity for Investors and Employees
A Lease-to-Sell Agreement has two distinct parts:
- a traditional lease and
- the right to sell the property to realize any capital gains on a partial interest in the property.
A professional who can afford a $300,000 mortgage can enter into a Lease-to-Sell agreement to realize the capital gains on a $300,000 investment in a $2 million condominium or townhome. The monthly payment would be used to defray the cost of holding, managing and maintaining the unit including property taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. The employee would be responsible for utilities, renter’s insurance and providing onsite property management.
After 10 years, the employee could decide to realize their portion of the capital gains that have occurred on the property. Based on historic price performance in the Aspen market, it is reasonable to expect the property values to have doubled. The employee would have $300,000 in equity built from scratch through their Lease-to-Sell payments. The investors would collect the remaining $3.7 million in equity, an 85% increase on their initial $2 million investment.

Mimicking how the ultra-wealthy invest in Aspen, the Housing Fund will purchase housing units outright in all cash transactions. The Housing Fund will not have any debt, only equity.
The Investor does not have to continuously pay property taxes, insurance, maintenance and other holding costs. These costs are covered by the employee’s monthly Lease-to-Sell payment.
There is no mortgage provided to the employee, only a lease. There is no costly and lengthy foreclosure if things go wrong, only the simpler and more timely eviction process.
Unlike traditional mortgages or leases, the interest of the employee and investor are aligned. Both are motivated to increase the value of the property as much as possible.
By avoiding the property’s holding costs, the return on investment is actually improved even through the employee is given a partial interest in the future capital gains on property.
The lion’s share of the capital gains and any retained earnings go to the investor. The compounded annual growth of a real estate investment offers superior returns over a mortgage’s simple interest.
The Housing Fund does not use leverage to acquire properties, only equity. There is no mortgage or loan to payoff and no need to face foreclose or bankruptcy if things go wrong.
The Housing Fund owns the property outright so there is no loan for the employee to pay off. Instead, the employee enters into a Lease-to-Sell agreement and makes monthly payments.
Down payments are a huge barrier to home ownership. Luckily, there isn’t one to worry about. There is a double damage deposit but no last month’s rent.
The employee builds equity over time as the house appreciates in value. This allows the employee to realize free market returns and is vastly superior to renting where no equity can be accrued.
The right or option to sell provides the employee with the ability to realize the capital gains on their prorated interest in their house. The Fund can utilize it’s Right of First Refusal to buy out the employee’s interest and retain the property.
The investors may choose to buy out the employee's interest based on an appraisal. Otherwise, the house will be sold and the capital gains after deducting real estate commissions and other transactional costs are prorated between the employee and fund investors.



The process used to secure a mortgage is extremely complex and prone to financial collapse. The Lease-to-Sell process is far simpler and designed for financial stability.

The Lease-to-Sell process is far simpler and more stable. The interests of the investor and employee are aligned in the pursuit of capital gains.